
Most people who search for this have not been told they need an operation. They have been living with symptoms for a while, someone has mentioned surgery, and they want to know how bad it is before it becomes a real decision. The honest answer is that the great majority of haemorrhoids never need surgery. Excisional haemorrhoidectomy is reserved for large, circumferential or grade 4 disease, for mixed internal and external components that cannot be treated from inside the anal canal, and for people in whom clinic-based treatments have genuinely been tried and have failed. Even most prolapsed haemorrhoids are treatable without an operation. If nobody has examined you with a proctoscope and told you your grade, you are not yet at the point where surgery is the question. The right first step is finding out exactly what you have, because the treatment ladder for grade 2 disease looks nothing like the ladder for grade 4, and the difference is not something you can determine yourself.
Conventional excisional haemorrhoidectomy, sometimes called the Milligan-Morgan or open technique in the UK, is performed under general or spinal anaesthetic in an operating theatre. The surgeon cuts out the haemorrhoidal tissue together with its feeding vessel, leaving raw wounds in the anal canal that are either left open to heal by themselves or closed with dissolvable stitches. It usually takes twenty to forty minutes and most people go home the same day. The variations you may be offered are stapled haemorrhoidopexy, which lifts and staples the prolapsing tissue back up rather than removing it, haemorrhoidal artery ligation, which ties off the arteries under ultrasound guidance, and energy-device techniques using LigaSure or a harmonic scalpel to seal as they cut. They differ in pain and durability, and the differences are better established than most patients are told.
This is the question people actually want answered, and the answer is that excisional haemorrhoidectomy is one of the more painful routine operations in general surgery. Expect severe pain for the first two days, substantial pain through the first week, and a noticeable easing during the second week. Most patients describe days three to seven as the worst, which catches people out because they have been discharged and assume the trajectory only goes one way. The pain is worst on opening your bowels, and this creates a predictable trap: people avoid going, become constipated, and then face a hard stool passing over open wounds. This is why laxatives are prescribed as standard rather than optionally, and why they should be taken from day one rather than started once there is a problem. Pain is manageable with the right medication and a proper bowel regime, but nobody should walk into this operation expecting mild discomfort.
Week one is dominated by pain, bleeding on wiping, and anxiety about the first bowel movement, which typically happens on day two or three and is the single most feared moment of the recovery. Week two is a clear improvement, though bowel movements remain uncomfortable and there is usually still some discharge and spotting. By weeks three and four most people are back to ordinary daily activity and the pain is intermittent rather than constant. Complete wound healing takes six to twelve weeks, and the majority of patients consider themselves fully recovered at around three months. Some swelling, a residual skin tag, or an odd sensation on wiping can persist beyond that and is not a sign anything has gone wrong. Sitting on hard surfaces, driving, and exercise all come back gradually, and the common mistake is trying to compress this timeline because you feel better at week two.
UK hospital guidance typically suggests around two weeks off for a desk-based job, and this is a reasonable planning assumption rather than a guarantee. In the UK you can self-certify for the first seven days and will need a fit note from your GP beyond that. Manual work, heavy lifting, long driving, and jobs that involve prolonged sitting on a hard seat realistically need three to four weeks, and it is far better to book that time and return early than to book one week and have to extend it. Two practical points get overlooked. First, plan the bathroom logistics of returning to work before you go back, because a workplace toilet is a very different proposition in week two. Second, book the operation with a clear fortnight around it rather than squeezing it against a deadline, because the recovery does not negotiate.
Overall complication rates after haemorrhoidectomy sit at roughly nine per cent across published series, which is low, but the individual risks are worth knowing by name. Urinary retention is the commonest early problem, reported at around five per cent in Cochrane data after open haemorrhoidectomy and considerably higher in some series, and it is the usual reason someone is not discharged the same day. Bleeding significant enough to need intervention affects a small minority, typically around a week to ten days after surgery when the wound tissue separates. Anal stenosis, a narrowing of the canal from scarring, appears at under one per cent in Cochrane data and up to five per cent in some randomised trials. Changes in continence are the risk that worries patients most: early minor incontinence is reported at around five per cent in randomised trials, and one large series found new anal incontinence in about eight per cent at one year. Most of it is minor and improves, but it is a real number and deserves an honest conversation before you consent.
Stapled haemorrhoidopexy was widely promoted as the less painful alternative and the evidence largely bears that out in the short term, but the trade-off is now well established. The eTHoS trial, a large UK randomised study published in the Lancet, found recurrence at twelve months in around thirty-two per cent of stapled patients compared with fourteen per cent after conventional excision. Meta-analyses show substantially higher odds of needing a further procedure after stapling, both for recurrent prolapse and for bleeding. The pain advantage is real but narrow: lower for the first three weeks, with no meaningful difference by six weeks. If you are being offered stapling on the basis that it hurts less, that is true, and you should also know that you are roughly twice as likely to be back with the same problem within a year. Neither choice is wrong, but it should be a choice you make with both numbers in front of you.
Haemorrhoidal artery ligation, sometimes called HAL or THD, uses a Doppler probe to locate and tie off the arteries feeding the haemorrhoids, avoiding open wounds. The HubBLe trial compared it directly with rubber band ligation in second and third degree disease and produced a nuanced result that is often misquoted. At twelve months, recurrence was forty-nine per cent after banding versus thirty per cent after artery ligation, which sounds decisive until you look at why: the gap was driven mainly by the number of patients needing a repeat procedure, and those who simply had banding repeated ended up with comparable outcomes. Artery ligation was more painful in the early postoperative period and cost around a thousand pounds more per patient, giving a cost per quality-adjusted life year far above the threshold at which the NHS considers a treatment worth funding. The trial did not show that banding is inferior; it showed that banding often needs repeating, which is a different and much less alarming statement.
A properly ordered treatment ladder starts with stool consistency, because straining against hard stool is what created the problem and what will recreate it after any procedure. A high fibre diet, adequate fluid, and a laxative where needed are not filler advice; they are the reason some people avoid a procedure entirely. Above that sit the clinic-based options, carried out in an outpatient room without anaesthetic: rubber band ligation, injection sclerotherapy, infrared coagulation, electrotherapy, and radiofrequency techniques. Our comparison of non-surgical haemorrhoid treatments sets out how they differ, and our overview of modern haemorrhoid treatments covers indicative UK costs. A piles cream belongs at the bottom of this ladder rather than at the top of it, because it treats the symptom and not the vessel. Surgery earns its place when these have been tried by someone who examined you first, not when they were tried by you on your own for eighteen months.
At Haemorrhoid Centre we treat internal and prolapsing haemorrhoids with eXroid electrotherapy, delivered through a proctoscope in an outpatient appointment with no anaesthetic, no cutting and no stitches. A low-dose direct current is applied at the base of the haemorrhoid, producing a chemical reaction that closes the feeding vessel so the tissue shrinks over the following weeks. Improvement is usually evident within seven to ten days and can continue for up to four weeks. We treat up to three haemorrhoids in a session, which commonly runs fifteen to thirty minutes, and our procedure page sets out exactly what the appointment involves. Two things need saying plainly. First, the published expectation from the manufacturer is that roughly half of patients are satisfied after a single treatment and the other half need a further session, with the interval not less than four weeks and ideally six to eight; in our own records the figure has been better than that, with 98 of the 116 patients treated at our clinics since January 2025, or 84 per cent, needing only one session, 17 needing two and one needing three. We quote both because an audit of a single clinic is not the same thing as a published expectation, and because neither number predicts what any individual will need. That cannot be judged from the examination, which is why we do not promise anyone a number of treatments in advance. Second, NICE has issued positive guidance for grades 1 to 3; grade 4 was not included in that guidance, and anyone telling you it is approved for all grades is overstating it.
It is not, and we would rather you heard that from us than discovered it in the room. Electrotherapy is carried out without anaesthetic and most patients find it uncomfortable; a fair number find it properly painful while it is happening, with some describing it in the region of six to eight out of ten. What differs from surgery is the shape of the experience rather than the absence of pain. The discomfort is confined to the procedure itself and settles quickly once it finishes, usually eased by simple painkillers, and there is no wound, no open tissue and no bowel movement to dread on day three. You walk out and go about your day. Compare that with a fortnight of post-surgical pain that peaks on the fourth day. Both involve pain; only one involves a recovery. Anyone who promises you a painless procedure has told you something they cannot deliver, and your consent is not valid if it was based on it.
It is not right for everyone, and the exclusions matter more than the marketing. Purely external haemorrhoids cannot be treated this way, because the treatment is delivered inside the anal canal; prolapsing internal ones can. Pregnancy is a contraindication, as is a bleeding disorder. Anyone with a pacemaker or implanted defibrillator needs written cardiology clearance before booking, and in many cases the answer is no. Warfarin is acceptable with a current INR of 3.0 or below, and apixaban is not regarded as a contraindication. If examination is too painful to complete, which most often happens when there is an undiagnosed anal fissure rather than haemorrhoidal disease, then treatment does not go ahead until that is dealt with. This is also the reason we do not book people straight into treatment on symptoms alone: the assessment is what determines whether any of this applies to you.
Haemorrhoid surgery is available on the NHS and for many people that is the right route, particularly for grade 4 or complex disease where an operation is genuinely indicated. The constraint is time. In mid-2026 the elective waiting list in England stood at around six million patients, with roughly four in ten waiting longer than eighteen weeks and a median wait close to twelve weeks. Benign anorectal conditions are not prioritised within that queue, and the pathway usually involves a GP referral, an outpatient appointment, then a further wait for a theatre date. Privately, an excisional haemorrhoidectomy in the UK typically costs somewhere in the region of £3,000 to £5,000 or more once theatre and anaesthetic fees are included, while an outpatient consultation and electrotherapy treatment with us is £1,095. The financial comparison only makes sense once you know which treatment you actually need, which is why the assessment comes first.
Yes, sometimes, and the honest framing is that no haemorrhoid treatment is permanent in the way people hope. Excisional surgery has the lowest recurrence of the options, at roughly fourteen per cent at one year in the eTHoS data, but the vessels that were removed are not the only vessels you have, and the behaviour that enlarged them is still available to you. Recurrence after stapling is roughly double that, and after banding it is higher again, though banding is easily repeated. What actually determines your long-term outcome is what happens after the procedure: stool that passes without straining, no reading on the toilet, no prolonged sitting, and prompt attention if bleeding starts again rather than another two years of waiting. Our guide to how long haemorrhoids last covers the natural history in more detail, and it is worth reading before you assume an operation is the end of the story.
Some symptoms mean the conversation is not about which haemorrhoid treatment to choose. Rectal bleeding that is dark rather than bright, blood mixed through the stool rather than on the paper, or bleeding alongside a change in bowel habit lasting more than three weeks needs assessing for bowel cancer before anything else, and being assumed to be piles is the classic route by which that diagnosis is missed. Sharp, tearing pain on opening your bowels that lingers afterwards points to an anal fissure rather than haemorrhoids, and treating the wrong condition wastes months. A sudden, exquisitely tender lump appearing over hours is a thrombosed haemorrhoid, which has its own time-critical treatment window. Unexplained weight loss, a lump or ulcer that does not heal, or persistent anal itching with skin changes all need looking at rather than treating blind. None of these mean something terrible is happening. They mean the order of investigation changes.
Almost everything in this article depends on one thing you cannot establish at home: which grade and type of haemorrhoids you have, and whether they are what is causing your symptoms at all. That takes a few minutes with a proctoscope and it is uncomfortable rather than painful. Our severity test gives a quick indication of how urgent your situation is likely to be, and is a reasonable place to start if you are still deciding whether to do anything. If you would rather talk to someone, contact us or book an appointment and we will examine you properly, tell you your grade, and be direct about whether this is something we can treat or something that genuinely needs a surgeon. Being told you do not need an operation is a good outcome. Being told you do, by someone who has actually looked, is a better one than wondering for another year.
Haemorrhoid centre London
93 Wardour Street
London, W1F 0UD
Haemorrhoid centre Glasgow
1 Blythswood Square
Glasgow, G2 4AD
Haemorrhoid centre Edinburgh
53 Dundas Street
Edinburgh, EH3 6RS
Tel: 020 3910 1601
Email: info@haemorrhoidcentre.com